Quantcast
Channel: SQL Server Replication forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4054

Is there a Setting graded ranks or importance on Peer to peer replication?

$
0
0

I have already a database working on 2 different cities and syncronised with peer to peer replication. Now It is working only with data but related to this data BLOB will be included  to system. There will be 2  BLOB objects related to a single data and will be (2x300) total 600 KB each. And from the application, data is coming with a package like 10000 data each(and bulk inserted) so related BLOB data may be 6 GB total. These BLOB data is not high importance for me but data is.

So If I include BLOB to same article because of syncronisation will work in order, second incoming high importance data will wait the first came 6 GB BLOB to finish syncronisation. (or am I wrong?)

My first question is I can't find a setting like graded ranks or high importancy for replication. Is there smt like that?

Then I found an idea. I can set 2 different peer to peer replication with different articles. But this time if I use same distribution table I think there won't be any difference to work in order. So I decided to create 2 different distribution table. But this time I can not find how to say to second publication to use second distribution table.

If this is possible, In my opinion replication on data part won't wait the replication on BLOB part and work seperately. My second question Is this possible? If so how?

P.S I don't want to use a different database for BLOB




Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4054

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>