I set up transactional replication between a SQL Server 2005 database and a 2012 database on different machines. The 2005 is the Publisher and the 2012 database is the
subscriber with the 2012 Instance acting as the distributor. The 2005 database is the primary in a log shipping config to another 2005 database on a third machine. I understand that sp_repldone is used to mark the last distributed transaction.
Am I experiencing a conflict between transaction log backups happening in the log shipping config versus log reader agent functionality in the transactional replication?
Replication-Replication Transaction-Log Reader Subsystem: agent STL-C6SQL01-WestecData-1 scheduled for retry. The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'MyComputerName'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 2, code: 20011, text: 'The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'MyComputrName'.'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'MyComputrName'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 2, code: 64, text: 'TCP Provider: The specified network name is no longer available.'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 2, code: 64, text: 'Communication link failure'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 0, code: 22017, text: 'The process could not set the last distributed transaction.'
Replication-Replication Transaction-Log Reader Subsystem: agent STL-C6SQL01-WestecData-1 scheduled for retry. The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'MyComputerName'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 2, code: 20011, text: 'The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'MyComputrName'.'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 The process could not execute 'sp_repldone/sp_replcounters' on 'MyComputrName'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 2, code: 64, text: 'TCP Provider: The specified network name is no longer available.'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 2, code: 64, text: 'Communication link failure'.
2014-06-02 13:14:38.305 Status: 0, code: 22017, text: 'The process could not set the last distributed transaction.'
Lee Markum