Quantcast
Channel: SQL Server Replication forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4054

Replication better Approach

$
0
0

Hi All,

I want better approach for example:-

A- Publisher in Kol

C- Subscriber in Kol (want to used reading purpose only)

D- Subscriber in US (want to use reading purpose as well HA)

*Insertion/Updation/Deletion only one end on A publisher

for same scenarion i am thinking doing peer to peer or transaction replication with queue updating .

if I am using transaction replication with queue updating with Pull Subscription then add B for distriutor.I think this is better because if transaction not go in Subscriber then overhead to the distributor .....

I am using SQL 2008 R2 Enterprise.

Please let me know which one is beteer approach in terms of performance...

I have another option :-

A- Publisher in Kol

B-Distribution in Kol

C- Subscriber in Kol

D- Subscriber in US

but this doesnt provide HA but i am thinking adding HA as well and remove mirrioring.I have no issue for down time for 10 min (change application path like that)

Thanks..


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4054

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>